Researchers are sharing encouraging early reports about o1-preview as an aid for tackling complex scientific challenges.
Researchers at the national lab have also been surprised by o1-preview’s ability to recognize when it doesn’t have all the necessary information to answer a question and make reasonable assumptions for variables it might be missing, the person said.
The Lawrence Livermore example is similar to the positive reaction Australian-American mathematician Terence Tao shared after the initial release of o1-preview and o1-mini. Tao used the models to solve math problems and write proofs—something that a typical ChatGPT user probably wouldn’t do.
“It may only take one or two further iterations of improved capability” until such a reasoning model becomes a “competent graduate student…at which point I could see this tool being of significant use in research level tasks,” he said.
This dilemma mirrors one potentially faced by junior lawyers: if AI handles graduate-level research tasks, how will the next generation of researchers develop their skills?